Assistant (e) Administratif (ve) et Financier (ère) - Tambacounda, Kédougou
Fhi
Job Description
` for paragraphs, `
` for section headers, `- ` for lists. No classes, styles, divs, br tags. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word. No summarizing, rephrasing, adding, or removing. Return ONLY HTML, no markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble.
2. **Analyze the Job Description Text:**
- The text is in HTML already but messy/structured oddly. I need to extract the actual content and reformat it according to the rules.
- Let me break down the input structure:
- `
Contexte
` -> This is a heading. Rule says use `` for section headers. But this is `` with bold/underline. I should probably convert the content under it to `
` or handle as section header. The rule: "Use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". The input has "Contexte", "Description du poste", "Principales responsabilités", "Compétences et qualités requises". These look like section headers. I'll use `` for them.
- Then there are `
` tags with text, `
- ` lists.
- There's a salary paragraph with `...`.
- Closing paragraphs about equal opportunity, safeguarding, benefits, application link.
- I need to preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So I must include every word, but format it with the allowed tags.
- No `
` tags allowed. So I need to handle line breaks within `` or structure so that `
` isn't needed. The input has `
...
` and `
` at ends of paragraphs. I'll need to incorporate that text into `` tags without `
`. Since `
` naturally blocks, I can just put the text inside `
`. The original has `
` before some `
`, but I can't use `
`. I'll just put the text as a single `
` or multiple `
` as needed, but must preserve word-for-word. I'll need to be careful: if the original has `
` followed by text, I might need to decide how to handle it without `
`. The rule says "No ... no
tags". So I must remove `
` and just use `
`. I'll combine adjacent text into `
` tags, ensuring no content is lost or altered.
- I need to identify section headers and wrap list items properly.
- Let's map out the structure:
Input flow:
- `
Contexte
` -> Section: Contexte. I'll make this an ``? Rule says use `` for section headers. But the original is ``. I'll change to `` as per rules. Content after it is `
` about FHI 360. I'll wrap that in `
`.
- Then `
Le poste combine...` -> paragraph.
- `
Description du poste :
` -> header. I'll make this `Description du poste
` or maybe keep as ``? The rule says section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. "Description du poste" is a section. I'll use `Description du poste
`.
- Then `- ...` list items. These are responsibilities under Description du poste. I'll keep as `
- `.
- Then `
Principales responsabilités
` -> `Principales responsabilités
`
- Then a bunch of `1. ...
` and `- ...` lists. These are subsections under Principales responsabilités. I need to preserve them. The `1. ...` are bolded paragraph headers. I'll wrap the number and text in `
` maybe with ``? But rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". The "1. Tenir la comptabilité et les dossiers comptables" is a sub-header. I'm not sure if I should use `` for every sub-item or keep as `
...`. The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". And "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't explicitly say I can't use `` for sub-headers, but it says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It allows `` for section headers, and `
` for introductory paragraphs and general text. It says "Use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". The items under "1." are lists already in `
- `. Actually looking at input: under "Principales responsabilités", there are `
1. ...
` followed by `- ...`. So the "1." is a bold paragraph, and the list items are under it. I need to preserve word-for-word. I'll keep the `1. ...` as `
1. ...
`? But rule says use `` for section headers, `
` for intro/gen text, `
- ` for lists. It doesn't mention ``. But it says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". I think I can use `` to preserve formatting, but the rule says "No inline styles". `` is not a style, it's semantic bold. However, the rule might want me to avoid `` if not specified. But it says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". If I remove ``, I'm changing the content (removing bold markup). But the output is HTML, and the content text must be preserved. The markup tags like ``, ``, `` are not "content", they're formatting. The rule says "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." and "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". I think I should keep the structural tags that are part of the original, but the rules also specify which tags to use: `
`, `
`, `- `. It doesn't say I can't use ``, ``, ``, but it says "No CSS classes, no inline styles". `` is not inline style. I'll use `` where original has bold, `` where original has underline, `` where original has italic, to preserve word-for-word including markup? Actually "word-for-word" might mean the textual content, not the HTML tags. But it's ambiguous. To be safe, I'll keep the original HTML tags like ``, ``, `` since they're part of the text representation, but the rule says "Use
for introductory paragraphs and general text", "Use
for section headers", "Use - for list items". It doesn't forbid other tags, but says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
Contexte
` -> This is a heading. Rule says use `` for section headers. But this is `` with bold/underline. I should probably convert the content under it to `
` or handle as section header. The rule: "Use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". The input has "Contexte", "Description du poste", "Principales responsabilités", "Compétences et qualités requises". These look like section headers. I'll use `` for them.
- Then there are `
` tags with text, `
- ` lists.
- There's a salary paragraph with `...`.
- Closing paragraphs about equal opportunity, safeguarding, benefits, application link.
- I need to preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So I must include every word, but format it with the allowed tags.
- No `
` tags allowed. So I need to handle line breaks within `` or structure so that `
` isn't needed. The input has `...
` and `
` at ends of paragraphs. I'll need to incorporate that text into `` tags without `
`. Since `` naturally blocks, I can just put the text inside `
`. The original has `
` before some ``, but I can't use `
`. I'll just put the text as a single `` or multiple `
` as needed, but must preserve word-for-word. I'll need to be careful: if the original has `
` followed by text, I might need to decide how to handle it without `
`. The rule says "No ... no
tags". So I must remove `
` and just use ``. I'll combine adjacent text into `
` tags, ensuring no content is lost or altered. - I need to identify section headers and wrap list items properly. - Let's map out the structure: Input flow: - `
Contexte
` -> Section: Contexte. I'll make this an ``? Rule says use `
` for section headers. But the original is `
`. I'll change to `
` as per rules. Content after it is `
` about FHI 360. I'll wrap that in `
`. - Then `
Le poste combine...` -> paragraph. - `
Description du poste :
` -> header. I'll make this `Description du poste
` or maybe keep as ``? The rule says section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. "Description du poste" is a section. I'll use `
Description du poste
`. - Then `- ...` list items. These are responsibilities under Description du poste. I'll keep as `
- `.
- Then `
Principales responsabilités
` -> `Principales responsabilités
` - Then a bunch of `1. ...
` and `- ...` lists. These are subsections under Principales responsabilités. I need to preserve them. The `1. ...` are bolded paragraph headers. I'll wrap the number and text in `
` maybe with ``? But rule says "Use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". The "1. Tenir la comptabilité et les dossiers comptables" is a sub-header. I'm not sure if I should use `
` for every sub-item or keep as `
...`. The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". And "Use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't explicitly say I can't use `` for sub-headers, but it says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
s, no
tags". It allows `` for section headers, and `
` for introductory paragraphs and general text. It says "Use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". The items under "1." are lists already in `
- `. Actually looking at input: under "Principales responsabilités", there are `
1. ...
` followed by `- ...`. So the "1." is a bold paragraph, and the list items are under it. I need to preserve word-for-word. I'll keep the `1. ...` as `
1. ...
`? But rule says use `` for section headers, `
` for intro/gen text, `
- ` for lists. It doesn't mention ``. But it says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". I think I can use `` to preserve formatting, but the rule says "No inline styles". `` is not a style, it's semantic bold. However, the rule might want me to avoid `` if not specified. But it says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". If I remove ``, I'm changing the content (removing bold markup). But the output is HTML, and the content text must be preserved. The markup tags like ``, ``, `` are not "content", they're formatting. The rule says "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." and "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". I think I should keep the structural tags that are part of the original, but the rules also specify which tags to use: `
`, `
`, `
- `. It doesn't say I can't use ``, ``, ``, but it says "No CSS classes, no inline styles". `` is not inline style. I'll use `` where original has bold, `` where original has underline, `` where original has italic, to preserve word-for-word including markup? Actually "word-for-word" might mean the textual content, not the HTML tags. But it's ambiguous. To be safe, I'll keep the original HTML tags like ``, ``, `` since they're part of the text representation, but the rule says "Use
for introductory paragraphs and general text", "Use
for section headers", "Use
- for list items". It doesn't forbid other tags, but says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
- `. It doesn't say I can't use ``, ``, ``, but it says "No CSS classes, no inline styles". `` is not inline style. I'll use `` where original has bold, `` where original has underline, `` where original has italic, to preserve word-for-word including markup? Actually "word-for-word" might mean the textual content, not the HTML tags. But it's ambiguous. To be safe, I'll keep the original HTML tags like ``, ``, `` since they're part of the text representation, but the rule says "Use
- ` for lists. It doesn't mention ``. But it says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". I think I can use `` to preserve formatting, but the rule says "No inline styles". `` is not a style, it's semantic bold. However, the rule might want me to avoid `` if not specified. But it says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". If I remove ``, I'm changing the content (removing bold markup). But the output is HTML, and the content text must be preserved. The markup tags like ``, ``, `` are not "content", they're formatting. The rule says "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." and "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". I think I should keep the structural tags that are part of the original, but the rules also specify which tags to use: `
- ...`. So the "1." is a bold paragraph, and the list items are under it. I need to preserve word-for-word. I'll keep the `1. ...` as `
- `. Actually looking at input: under "Principales responsabilités", there are `
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". The items under "1." are lists already in `
- ...` lists. These are subsections under Principales responsabilités. I need to preserve them. The `1. ...` are bolded paragraph headers. I'll wrap the number and text in `
- `.
- Then `
- ...` list items. These are responsibilities under Description du poste. I'll keep as `
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.