OMF Financial Consultant (Potchefstroom River Walk)
Old Mutual
Job Description
for intro paragraphs and general text,
for section headers (Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). No CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in . Return ONLY the HTML.
We have raw HTML with many style tags etc. We need to extract the textual content and produce semantic HTML.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot change wording, but we can change tags. We must keep the exact text content (including spaces? Probably preserve as is). We need to remove style attributes etc.
We need to identify sections: The text includes:
- Intro: "
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts."
So intro paragraphs: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this." Then blank paragraphs (empty). Then "Job Description" bold heading. Then blank paragraphs. Then the sentence: "Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts."
Then we have Responsibilities
Customer Service
... etc.
We need to convert section headers to . The original uses for Responsibilities, then for sub-sections like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. According to rules, we should use for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we need to treat each major section header as . Sub-sections like Customer Service etc maybe should be
or maybe also
? The rule says use for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). It doesn't forbid using other heading levels, but we should follow semantic HTML: likely we should keep sub-sections as as well? But they said use for section headers (list). Could interpret that only those specific section headers should be . Others maybe just
. However, to preserve structure, we could treat each
as as well, but that might be adding extra headers not in list. The rule: "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading levels for other headings, but we should avoid adding extra markup not needed. Safer: convert all heading tags (, , ) to for consistency, as they are section headers. But the rule says use for section headers (e.g., ...). It doesn't forbid using for other headings. It says use for section headers. So we can treat all headings as section headers and wrap them in . That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
tags. We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot remove those tags. However, the instruction says to return clean semantic HTML, removing all formatting artifacts etc. But also says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. This is contradictory: we must remove styling tags etc but preserve content. The content includes the text; the tags are not content but formatting. So we can remove the style tags etc, but we must keep the textual content. The tags are also formatting; we can remove them as they are not content. The content is the words "Balances Stakeholders", etc. So we can drop the empty tags.
Thus we need to extract plain text content and then wrap in appropriate semantic tags.
Let's extract the textual content sequentially:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank lines)
4. "Job Description"
5. (blank)
6. "Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts."
7. "Responsibilities"
8. "Customer Service"
9. "Carry out standard customer service activities and handle simple customer inquiries."
10. (blank)
11. "Solutions Analysis"
12. "Assess compliance with established standards and protocols for routine inquiries."
13. (blank)
14. "Receiving Visitors"
15. "Receive visitors and assist with various requests for information, referring more complex matters to colleagues."
16. (blank)
17. "Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data"
18. "Ensure that basic customer details held in the system are accurate, and make notes of follow-up actions that have been promised, together with notes of actions taken during each sales call."
19. (blank)
20. "Customer Needs Clarification"
21. "Interview the customer, following a multilevel sales script, to clarify the customer's requirements."
22. (blank)
23. "Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting"
24. "Make calls (by telephone or in person) to allocated potential customers to develop relationships. Provide a first point of contact for resolving customer queries and complaints."
25. (blank)
26. "Operational Compliance"
27. "Follow a range of mandatory procedures to ensure that work is carried out to the required quality standards and/or to ensure adherence to external regulatory codes and internal codes of conduct."
28. (blank)
29. "Business Development"
30. "Carry out routine business development support tasks and assist others by following established procedures."
31. (blank)
32. "Sales Opportunities Creation"
33. "Identify potential customers by obtaining information, referrals, and recommendations from existing customers."
34. (blank)
35. "Data Exploration"
36. "Select appropriate data from information provided by others and input that data into spreadsheets or standard formats."
37. (blank)
38. "Network of Influence"
39. "Demonstrate understanding of the value of networking by participating in and contributing to a network of people, technologies, and ideas both inside and outside the company."
40. (blank)
41. (maybe a non-breaking space) "na" appears? Actually after the responsibilities block we see: "
na" There's a non-breaking space then "na". That seems like an artifact. "na" maybe stands for not applicable? It's part of content? It appears as stray text "na". According to rules, we should remove stray numbers or formatting artifacts. "na" could be considered a stray artifact. We should remove it. So we ignore "na".
42. (blank lines)
43. "Skills"
44. (blank)
45. "Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Evaluating Information, Identifying Customer Needs, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
46. (blank)
47. "Competencies"
48. (blank)
49. (blank)
50. "Balances Stakeholders"
51. "Builds Networks"
52. "Communicates Effectively"
53. "Customer Focus"
54. "Ensures Accountability"
55. "Instills Trust"
56. "Interpersonal Savvy"
57. "Manages Complexity"
58. (blank)
59. (blank)
60. "Education"
61. (blank)
62. (blank)
63. "NQF Level 5 - Higher, Advance or Occupational Certificate or equivalent"
64. (blank)
65. (blank)
66. (blank)
67. "Closing Date"
68. (blank)
69. (blank)
70. "01 October 2026 , 23:59"
71. (blank)
72. (blank)
73. "The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question."
74. (blank)
75. (blank)
76. "The Old Mutual Story!"
We need to preserve the italic and bold tags? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. The content includes the text inside those tags, but the tags themselves are formatting. We can drop them but keep the text. However, the text includes the phrase with bold and italic. We should output the text without those tags, as they are formatting. The rule says remove social sharing text, author bylines, navigation, etc. It didn't explicitly say to remove HTML tags, but we are to output clean semantic HTML. So we should strip all original tags and reapply our own semantic tags. So we will output plain text content inside appropriate tags.
Thus final HTML:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts.
Then Responsibilities section: Responsibilities
then a with each duty as - . Should we include subheadings? The subheadings like Customer Service etc are part of responsibilities; we could either keep them as
inside the responsibilities section or treat them as inside - . But the rule says use
for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc). It didn't say to use for sub-sections. However, we could treat each subheading as a as well, but then we would have many sections. Might be okay but could be considered over-sectioning. The original had Responsibilities then subheadings. If we convert all to , we lose hierarchy. But we are not required to preserve hierarchy, just to output clean semantic HTML. Using for each heading is acceptable.
Alternatively, we could keep subheadings as
with bold? But we must not add styling. Could use
for subheading text. But then we lose semantic heading. The rule didn't forbid using other heading levels; it just said use
for section headers (list). It didn't say we cannot use other heading levels for other headings. So we could use for main sections like Responsibilities, Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date, etc. And for subheadings under Responsibilities we could use
or maybe
but we are not allowed to use ? Not prohibited. But to keep simple, we can treat all headings as . That will produce many sections.
Let's list all headings we encounter:
- Responsibilities (h1)
- Customer Service (h2)
- Solutions Analysis (h2)
- Receiving Visitors (h2)
- Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data (h2)
- Customer Needs Clarification (h2)
- Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting (h2)
- Operational Compliance (h2)
- Business Development (h2)
- Sales Opportunities Creation (h2)
- Data Exploration (h2)
- Network of Influence (h2)
- Skills (b)
- Competencies (b)
- Education (b)
- Closing Date (b)
- The appointment will be made... (i b) - this is a note, not a heading.
- The Old Mutual Story! (i b span) - maybe a tagline.
We could treat the note and tagline as
with and ? But we should not add styling. We'll just output as with the text.
Thus we will produce:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts.
Responsibilities
Customer Service
Carry out standard customer service activities and handle simple customer inquiries.
Solutions Analysis
Assess compliance with established standards and protocols for routine inquiries.
Receiving Visitors
Receive visitors and assist with various requests for information, referring more complex matters to colleagues.
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data
Ensure that basic customer details held in the system are accurate, and make notes of follow-up actions that have been promised, together with notes of actions taken during each sales call.
Customer Needs Clarification
Interview the customer, following a multilevel sales script, to clarify the customer's requirements.
Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting
Make calls (by telephone or in person) to allocated potential customers to develop relationships. Provide a first point of contact for resolving customer queries and complaints.
Operational Compliance
Follow a range of mandatory procedures to ensure that work is carried out to the required quality standards and/or to ensure adherence to external regulatory codes and internal codes of conduct.
Business Development
Carry out routine business development support tasks and assist others by following established procedures.
Sales Opportunities Creation
Identify potential customers by
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
. Return ONLY the HTML. We have raw HTML with many style tags etc. We need to extract the textual content and produce semantic HTML. We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot change wording, but we can change tags. We must keep the exact text content (including spaces? Probably preserve as is). We need to remove style attributes etc. We need to identify sections: The text includes: - Intro: "
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts." So intro paragraphs: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this." Then blank paragraphs (empty). Then "Job Description" bold heading. Then blank paragraphs. Then the sentence: "Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts." Then we haveResponsibilities
Customer Service
... etc. We need to convert section headers to. The original uses for Responsibilities, then for sub-sections like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. According to rules, we should use for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we need to treat each major section header as . Sub-sections like Customer Service etc maybe should be
for sub-sections like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. According to rules, we should use for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we need to treat each major section header as . Sub-sections like Customer Service etc maybe should be
. Sub-sections like Customer Service etc maybe should be
or maybe also
? The rule says use for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). It doesn't forbid using other heading levels, but we should follow semantic HTML: likely we should keep sub-sections as as well? But they said use for section headers (list). Could interpret that only those specific section headers should be . Others maybe just
as well? But they said use for section headers (list). Could interpret that only those specific section headers should be . Others maybe just
. Others maybe just
. However, to preserve structure, we could treat each
as as well, but that might be adding extra headers not in list. The rule: "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading levels for other headings, but we should avoid adding extra markup not needed. Safer: convert all heading tags (, , ) to for consistency, as they are section headers. But the rule says use for section headers (e.g., ...). It doesn't forbid using for other headings. It says use for section headers. So we can treat all headings as section headers and wrap them in . That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
tags. We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot remove those tags. However, the instruction says to return clean semantic HTML, removing all formatting artifacts etc. But also says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. This is contradictory: we must remove styling tags etc but preserve content. The content includes the text; the tags are not content but formatting. So we can remove the style tags etc, but we must keep the textual content. The tags are also formatting; we can remove them as they are not content. The content is the words "Balances Stakeholders", etc. So we can drop the empty tags.
Thus we need to extract plain text content and then wrap in appropriate semantic tags.
Let's extract the textual content sequentially:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank lines)
4. "Job Description"
5. (blank)
6. "Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts."
7. "Responsibilities"
8. "Customer Service"
9. "Carry out standard customer service activities and handle simple customer inquiries."
10. (blank)
11. "Solutions Analysis"
12. "Assess compliance with established standards and protocols for routine inquiries."
13. (blank)
14. "Receiving Visitors"
15. "Receive visitors and assist with various requests for information, referring more complex matters to colleagues."
16. (blank)
17. "Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data"
18. "Ensure that basic customer details held in the system are accurate, and make notes of follow-up actions that have been promised, together with notes of actions taken during each sales call."
19. (blank)
20. "Customer Needs Clarification"
21. "Interview the customer, following a multilevel sales script, to clarify the customer's requirements."
22. (blank)
23. "Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting"
24. "Make calls (by telephone or in person) to allocated potential customers to develop relationships. Provide a first point of contact for resolving customer queries and complaints."
25. (blank)
26. "Operational Compliance"
27. "Follow a range of mandatory procedures to ensure that work is carried out to the required quality standards and/or to ensure adherence to external regulatory codes and internal codes of conduct."
28. (blank)
29. "Business Development"
30. "Carry out routine business development support tasks and assist others by following established procedures."
31. (blank)
32. "Sales Opportunities Creation"
33. "Identify potential customers by obtaining information, referrals, and recommendations from existing customers."
34. (blank)
35. "Data Exploration"
36. "Select appropriate data from information provided by others and input that data into spreadsheets or standard formats."
37. (blank)
38. "Network of Influence"
39. "Demonstrate understanding of the value of networking by participating in and contributing to a network of people, technologies, and ideas both inside and outside the company."
40. (blank)
41. (maybe a non-breaking space) "na" appears? Actually after the responsibilities block we see: "
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading levels for other headings, but we should avoid adding extra markup not needed. Safer: convert all heading tags (, , ) to for consistency, as they are section headers. But the rule says use for section headers (e.g., ...). It doesn't forbid using for other headings. It says use for section headers. So we can treat all headings as section headers and wrap them in . That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
tags. We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot remove those tags. However, the instruction says to return clean semantic HTML, removing all formatting artifacts etc. But also says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. This is contradictory: we must remove styling tags etc but preserve content. The content includes the text; the tags are not content but formatting. So we can remove the style tags etc, but we must keep the textual content. The tags are also formatting; we can remove them as they are not content. The content is the words "Balances Stakeholders", etc. So we can drop the empty tags.
Thus we need to extract plain text content and then wrap in appropriate semantic tags.
Let's extract the textual content sequentially:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank lines)
4. "Job Description"
5. (blank)
6. "Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts."
7. "Responsibilities"
8. "Customer Service"
9. "Carry out standard customer service activities and handle simple customer inquiries."
10. (blank)
11. "Solutions Analysis"
12. "Assess compliance with established standards and protocols for routine inquiries."
13. (blank)
14. "Receiving Visitors"
15. "Receive visitors and assist with various requests for information, referring more complex matters to colleagues."
16. (blank)
17. "Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data"
18. "Ensure that basic customer details held in the system are accurate, and make notes of follow-up actions that have been promised, together with notes of actions taken during each sales call."
19. (blank)
20. "Customer Needs Clarification"
21. "Interview the customer, following a multilevel sales script, to clarify the customer's requirements."
22. (blank)
23. "Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting"
24. "Make calls (by telephone or in person) to allocated potential customers to develop relationships. Provide a first point of contact for resolving customer queries and complaints."
25. (blank)
26. "Operational Compliance"
27. "Follow a range of mandatory procedures to ensure that work is carried out to the required quality standards and/or to ensure adherence to external regulatory codes and internal codes of conduct."
28. (blank)
29. "Business Development"
30. "Carry out routine business development support tasks and assist others by following established procedures."
31. (blank)
32. "Sales Opportunities Creation"
33. "Identify potential customers by obtaining information, referrals, and recommendations from existing customers."
34. (blank)
35. "Data Exploration"
36. "Select appropriate data from information provided by others and input that data into spreadsheets or standard formats."
37. (blank)
38. "Network of Influence"
39. "Demonstrate understanding of the value of networking by participating in and contributing to a network of people, technologies, and ideas both inside and outside the company."
40. (blank)
41. (maybe a non-breaking space) "na" appears? Actually after the responsibilities block we see: "
, ) to for consistency, as they are section headers. But the rule says use for section headers (e.g., ...). It doesn't forbid using for other headings. It says use for section headers. So we can treat all headings as section headers and wrap them in . That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
tags. We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot remove those tags. However, the instruction says to return clean semantic HTML, removing all formatting artifacts etc. But also says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. This is contradictory: we must remove styling tags etc but preserve content. The content includes the text; the tags are not content but formatting. So we can remove the style tags etc, but we must keep the textual content. The tags are also formatting; we can remove them as they are not content. The content is the words "Balances Stakeholders", etc. So we can drop the empty tags.
Thus we need to extract plain text content and then wrap in appropriate semantic tags.
Let's extract the textual content sequentially:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank lines)
4. "Job Description"
5. (blank)
6. "Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts."
7. "Responsibilities"
8. "Customer Service"
9. "Carry out standard customer service activities and handle simple customer inquiries."
10. (blank)
11. "Solutions Analysis"
12. "Assess compliance with established standards and protocols for routine inquiries."
13. (blank)
14. "Receiving Visitors"
15. "Receive visitors and assist with various requests for information, referring more complex matters to colleagues."
16. (blank)
17. "Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data"
18. "Ensure that basic customer details held in the system are accurate, and make notes of follow-up actions that have been promised, together with notes of actions taken during each sales call."
19. (blank)
20. "Customer Needs Clarification"
21. "Interview the customer, following a multilevel sales script, to clarify the customer's requirements."
22. (blank)
23. "Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting"
24. "Make calls (by telephone or in person) to allocated potential customers to develop relationships. Provide a first point of contact for resolving customer queries and complaints."
25. (blank)
26. "Operational Compliance"
27. "Follow a range of mandatory procedures to ensure that work is carried out to the required quality standards and/or to ensure adherence to external regulatory codes and internal codes of conduct."
28. (blank)
29. "Business Development"
30. "Carry out routine business development support tasks and assist others by following established procedures."
31. (blank)
32. "Sales Opportunities Creation"
33. "Identify potential customers by obtaining information, referrals, and recommendations from existing customers."
34. (blank)
35. "Data Exploration"
36. "Select appropriate data from information provided by others and input that data into spreadsheets or standard formats."
37. (blank)
38. "Network of Influence"
39. "Demonstrate understanding of the value of networking by participating in and contributing to a network of people, technologies, and ideas both inside and outside the company."
40. (blank)
41. (maybe a non-breaking space) "na" appears? Actually after the responsibilities block we see: "
for consistency, as they are section headers. But the rule says use for section headers (e.g., ...). It doesn't forbid using for other headings. It says use for section headers. So we can treat all headings as section headers and wrap them in . That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
for other headings. It says use for section headers. So we can treat all headings as section headers and wrap them in . That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
. That seems okay.
Then we need to use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). The responsibilities are listed as separate paragraphs under each subheading. They are not in a list originally. Should we convert them to list items? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
. But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as and then a with - for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity...
It seems each competency is followed by empty tags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). If the original text already has them as separate paragraphs, we could keep them as
. But the rule says to use
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
to
- is not adding or removing content, just changing tags. That's allowed because we are not altering text. So we can wrap each duty in
- inside a
- . But we need to decide grouping: The responsibilities are grouped under subheadings like Customer Service, Solutions Analysis, etc. Each subheading has a paragraph describing duty. Could treat each duty as list item under a
- for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- each skill? The rule says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So yes, we should split the comma-separated list into items. However, we must preserve original content word-for-word. Splitting into separate
- does not change wording, just separates. That's okay.
Competencies: list of items each preceded by etc. The original shows:
Competencies
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusEnsures AccountabilityInstills TrustInterpersonal SavvyManages Complexity... It seems each competency is followed by emptytags. So the text "Balances Stakeholders
- each skill? The rule says use
- for Responsibilities section. Or we could keep subheadings as
and then a
- with
- for each duty.
Similarly, Skills section: a paragraph listing skills separated by commas. Should we convert to
- . However, we must preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing format from
- for list items. It implies if there are duties etc that are listed, we should put them in
na" There's a non-breaking space then "na". That seems like an artifact. "na" maybe stands for not applicable? It's part of content? It appears as stray text "na". According to rules, we should remove stray numbers or formatting artifacts. "na" could be considered a stray artifact. We should remove it. So we ignore "na". 42. (blank lines) 43. "Skills" 44. (blank) 45. "Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Evaluating Information, Identifying Customer Needs, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships" 46. (blank) 47. "Competencies" 48. (blank) 49. (blank) 50. "Balances Stakeholders" 51. "Builds Networks" 52. "Communicates Effectively" 53. "Customer Focus" 54. "Ensures Accountability" 55. "Instills Trust" 56. "Interpersonal Savvy" 57. "Manages Complexity" 58. (blank) 59. (blank) 60. "Education" 61. (blank) 62. (blank) 63. "NQF Level 5 - Higher, Advance or Occupational Certificate or equivalent" 64. (blank) 65. (blank) 66. (blank) 67. "Closing Date" 68. (blank) 69. (blank) 70. "01 October 2026 , 23:59" 71. (blank) 72. (blank) 73. "The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question." 74. (blank) 75. (blank) 76. "The Old Mutual Story!" We need to preserve the italic and bold tags? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. The content includes the text inside those tags, but the tags themselves are formatting. We can drop them but keep the text. However, the text includes the phrase with bold and italic. We should output the text without those tags, as they are formatting. The rule says remove social sharing text, author bylines, navigation, etc. It didn't explicitly say to remove HTML tags, but we are to output clean semantic HTML. So we should strip all original tags and reapply our own semantic tags. So we will output plain text content inside appropriate tags. Thus final HTML:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts.
Then Responsibilities section:Responsibilities
then a- with each duty as
- . Should we include subheadings? The subheadings like Customer Service etc are part of responsibilities; we could either keep them as
inside the responsibilities section or treat them as inside
- . But the rule says use
for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc). It didn't say to use for sub-sections. However, we could treat each subheading as a
as well, but then we would have many
sections. Might be okay but could be considered over-sectioning. The original had
Responsibilities then
subheadings. If we convert all to
, we lose hierarchy. But we are not required to preserve hierarchy, just to output clean semantic HTML. Using
for each heading is acceptable. Alternatively, we could keep subheadings as
with bold? But we must not add styling. Could use
for subheading text. But then we lose semantic heading. The rule didn't forbid using other heading levels; it just said use
for section headers (list). It didn't say we cannot use other heading levels for other headings. So we could use
for main sections like Responsibilities, Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date, etc. And for subheadings under Responsibilities we could use
or maybe
but we are not allowed to use
? Not prohibited. But to keep simple, we can treat all headings as
. That will produce many
sections. Let's list all headings we encounter: - Responsibilities (h1) - Customer Service (h2) - Solutions Analysis (h2) - Receiving Visitors (h2) - Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data (h2) - Customer Needs Clarification (h2) - Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting (h2) - Operational Compliance (h2) - Business Development (h2) - Sales Opportunities Creation (h2) - Data Exploration (h2) - Network of Influence (h2) - Skills (b) - Competencies (b) - Education (b) - Closing Date (b) - The appointment will be made... (i b) - this is a note, not a heading. - The Old Mutual Story! (i b span) - maybe a tagline. We could treat the note and tagline as
with and ? But we should not add styling. We'll just output as
with the text. Thus we will produce:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
Provides advice on a specific range of products to a specific allocated market and are individually accountable for achieving results through their own efforts.
Responsibilities
Customer Service
Carry out standard customer service activities and handle simple customer inquiries.
Solutions Analysis
Assess compliance with established standards and protocols for routine inquiries.
Receiving Visitors
Receive visitors and assist with various requests for information, referring more complex matters to colleagues.
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data
Ensure that basic customer details held in the system are accurate, and make notes of follow-up actions that have been promised, together with notes of actions taken during each sales call.
Customer Needs Clarification
Interview the customer, following a multilevel sales script, to clarify the customer's requirements.
Customer Relationship Development / Prospecting
Make calls (by telephone or in person) to allocated potential customers to develop relationships. Provide a first point of contact for resolving customer queries and complaints.
Operational Compliance
Follow a range of mandatory procedures to ensure that work is carried out to the required quality standards and/or to ensure adherence to external regulatory codes and internal codes of conduct.
Business Development
Carry out routine business development support tasks and assist others by following established procedures.
Sales Opportunities Creation
Identify potential customers by
- . But the rule says use
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.